Van Jones Explains Resignation – Cenk Not Buying It

Updated : Sep 02, 2019 in Articles

Van Jones Explains Resignation – Cenk Not Buying It


have ngos was on campus was program uh… and he explained well what i have
more than i love tution and uh… why he stepped down so let’s
look at club number four come back part in just a few things that you these ninety levin truth ritual what
what did you make bold that story that started this raucous a banjo white house well you know i learned a tough lesson
on that first of all uh… deliveries they were actually believe uh… i believe the nine eleven was a
conspiracy by al qaeda it also i will be a lot and
and nobody else trying to hurt american i would have to me on that but tough
lesson there for me about six years ago i was at a conference of people came out
to me they said hey we we represent nine eleven p_m_ with unlike all ok good to
meet you that we need your help we help with a fisherman eveyone and then these people i know what their
agenda was they went and put my name on some of the horrid crazy language
they never showed me and never saw and he just sat there on his website for
you know years them i discovered it in limbo insult so
people actually believed actually sign on to find something i never saw never
signed on to and that became a part of this whole firestorm i decided at that point that i needed to because i was becoming a distraction
uh… and from my point of view the president as these deserve to be able to
talk not about my past in everything i read it or didn’t do but about america’s
future and such as a separate bella so your
decision anything call me a call them you know
and and you gotta remember uh… to some people politics of the on
this whole got you game cage match all that kind of stuff for me this is like
the best that i know people who don’t have health
insurance i’m no people i’ve known people who away without health insurance
for themselves trying to keep food on the tape he ever president trying to get doctors debate in the moment that he’s stepping forward
trying to fix one of our biggest problems uh… people start throwing ny as an issue and i think you know what you can see is a new one got their fight
i’m a clear the record i’m going to this is not true that’s not true with all
that would be was made to distraction baker yeah le binit i mean it’s where thing to say but well what does that mean distraction or
you didn’t want a fight with the truth with but i like that jones i’ve interviewed
him before for not on this show but i meet the blogger and is good guy and fights hearty smart guy
and how he’s probably unity of all the prints that somehow it’s gonna center
for american progress unloaded a higher than and the defendant
behind them this is guy with a lot of expertise in
green jobs and etc et-cetera et-cetera but this whole
idea of you just become a distraction t_v_ tell what actually happened cats terrible at sweet thoughts and my
sense is that he didn’t just opera decided on his own saw uh… as bad as
i’m not even really believing what he’s saying there i mean somebody came to a man said your
distraction you gotta get out of right and he bought it well baby had a bite i dunno but my
instinct would be the first when the depression is the fight and you know what you become a bigger
distraction if u ballinger had and you exit in which case it seems like they were
right and everyone pull people they didn’t sign the petition on form now on
film once after you left the white house every i’d know that that-that’s
established wisdom in washington that’s what you’re supposed to do but i don’t believe in that was that i
don’t think it makes sense an overdose of a jewish iddm first i thought you said you’d buy it uh… he thought and the the way for us off you know all
that you don’t buy that makes any sense that i think that’s the way like you
would think came up with that dot agresti armaments and doesn’t have a list usually just like a little bit of has
its own na the problem that’s all that’s not as was lunatics
uh… app if you don’t uplifted um… all right so that’s their job for u_s_
but he’ll be at back in the spotlight a whole lot more
now uh… now that you did the requisite
several months took a huge question up and don’t talk to people built on your
side to classic democrat mu shoes don’t tell you what are you don’t
have any result just take the boat but live down bedford and then come back uh… sometime later when i was very
efficient and has a lot of course would back him
up uh… of yesterday i overheard uh… the show alive phrase like having protestant plant profit yeah i know right you know what i think that we know you
make me play this clip this also is this people in the bar but at least in a bad jobs for but a initiative other form of that

100 Comments

  • Can you say that, only in a grammatically correct manner? I was unsure as to what point you were trying to make.

  • The whole world? You can only convince LESS THAN A THOUSAND architects and engineers, out of millions.

    Then you go and contradict yourself by saying that the masses fell for the lies of Nazi Germany.

    You can't have it both way, either EVERYBODY agrees with you, or EVERYBODY is completely decieved.

    Such self pwnage is just what I have come to expect from idiot truthers.

  • LOL… Now this idiot is defending a communist!

    I guess the difference between a communist and a liberal is much closer than a capitalist and a liberal. So, this makes sense! Oh I forgot, I mean a "progressive". LOL

    By the way, can people who refer to themselves as progressive be any more opposite from relity? LOL

  • @dangerouslytalented … Please tell me old wise man! LOL

    I'm not calling this Van Jones a communist. He gladly admits it. I didn't make any news by my claim.

    But the ideals of cummunism is far closer to liberalism than to capitalism. Please tell me how wrong I am.

  • Communism is a political construct which, if it worked, may have helped the lower classes. However, since they had this experiment in communism that lasted for 60 years called the Soviet Union, it has been made clear that it does not work at all. So it is not the idaeology that is wrong, it is the functionality that is compltely debunked.

    Van Jones said he was ONCE what you might call a communist, because of some of the idaeology fit with his.

  • The truthers use this trick all the time, just like the creationists. They trick people into signing petitions that are "to help the 911 victims" without revealing that it is actually about getting more names on the 911 truther mailing lists, so they can make believe that they are a bigger movement they actually are.

    Hell, I have been put on a couple of mailing lists full of space weapons and thermite and thermate and so forth. And I can't STAND these people.

  • Communism – a theory or system of social organization based on the holding of all property in common, actual ownership being ascribed to the community as a whole or to the state.

  • Liberalism – a political or social philosophy advocating the freedom of the individual, parliamentary systems of government, nonviolent modification of political, social, or economic institutions to assure unrestricted development in all spheres of human endeavor, and governmental guarantees of individual rights and civil liberties.

  • Capitalism – an economic system in which investment in and ownership of the means of production, distribution, and exchange of wealth is made and maintained chiefly by private individuals or corporations, esp. as contrasted to cooperatively or state-owned means of wealth.

  • @asmithj ….. I'm not sure where the liberalim definition comes from. But it has little to do with liberalism in practice today in America. Liberals today hate the idea of individual freedom. They believe in collective freedoms over individuals. Thus, the notion of govt forcing all to chip in whether the individual agrees to it or not. It's forced on them. Look at healthcare pushed by liberals. Do you think they care about the individual rights? Of course not.

  • Do you believe you should help others less fortunate than yourself? Do you believe we should come together for our common protection and good. ie The police, fire men, military, etc. If you believe we should come together on anything you are a liberal, if you believe we should never ban together, profit is king you are a capitalist. Not to get religious but I have never hear of a god, or savior who was a capitalist. Just a thought.

  • @asmithj … I belive what our constitution says.

    If people choose to help other great, to have a govt force people to do things they deem important then that is wrong, period. There is a basic function for govt as you mention police, fire, military etc… After that then we are getting into areas that govt has never been giving authority from our constitution in a collectivism society based on individuals with power to force their own priorities onto to all americans as law.

  • How would you lower insurance rates? A health insurance company in CA, capitalist based put in a 38% rate hike. This was after making record profits in 2009 when our economy was down. Is that ok with you. I would say yes if I don't need insurance and I owned the stock. I would say no if I need insurance. What do you think?

  • The Constitution says "We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America." What do you think is meant by the general welfare. I think it means we should help our brother when he falls. What do you think

  • @asmithj … 20% of medicaid costs is due to fraud. 1% of the public secto is considered fraud. That's 150 billion in savings. Because of afraid of being sued doctors often provide patients with many unnecassy tests. If we don't allow extreme lawsuits and it limit awards we'd save another 650 million in unnecessary tests. If we open up all states to all healthcare companies then competition will reduce costs. Wola! There ya go.

  • @asmithj …. Come on now. You are smarter than that, I hope.

    The articles of the constitution is what outlines our system of govt. the preamble is not governed into laws. This could mean anything you want it to mean to any degree. The articles is the meat and potatos of our govt.

    BTW, I meant to say 650 billion…. not million.

  • In every state there are more than 1 insurance company, why aren't they competing now? In pure capitalism we could have 300 insurance companies in each state. They will fight each other for young and health customers. Which company do you think will fight to cover the sick and the elderly? In my opinion non.
    Illness and medical bills caused half of the 1,458,000 personal bankruptcies in 2001, according to a study published by the journal Health Affairs.

  • @asmithj …. What? You relize that the more competition the more likely costs would be reduced. This is basic capitalism principles. So, you think having no competition and having the govt be the only game in town will reduce costs? You can't be that stupid. The idea that govt is just competing as a choice for comsumers is a joke. Govt can sustain heavy loses and can print their own money. Private business cannot. There's no way govt will do it cheaper it will drive up the costs for all.

  • I agree, but we decide what it means over time. Do you think an amendment was people of color or women? Or should it be assumed everyone has the same rights

  • @asmithj ….. are you suggesting the constitution can mean whatever you want it to mean? Or, even that overtime we can change it's meaning? I couldn't agree any less. The constitution means what it says and it's originally meaning. It makes no sense to have any constitution if you can change it's meaning to fit your politics. That's fascism and a very dangerous road to travel. The 14th amendment gives equal protection to answer your last question.

  • I am not stupid, I do believe we have laws in place to protect us from pure capitalism. Do you agree with the 40hr week, child labor laws, FDA and OSHA. These are government programs we have to protect us from pure capitalism. Do you agree

  • if you can't change it then why do we have amendments. Remember when it was written there were slaves in this country. Things change. Women did not have the right to vote. Things change. Our country made a living breathing document. That's why we are still here. We grow and change.

  • @asmithj ….. Why do you think I need to agree or disagree with anything? Our constition is what governs us not my opinion or yours. Thank god!

    You may feel a need to be protected from pure capitalism. I don't. Why is that a fear? BTW we are in no way or ever have been pure capitalists.

    There's no doubt that govt has a role, I am just saying many tasks taken upon by the govt is well beyond any constitution mandate. Govt is the least efficient way to deal with most problems.

  • Thank you. I think we should always talk to people of different believes, religions and thought. I am a Submarine vet and I was forced to live with people I wouldn't have chosen to, but thankfully it happened. I had a front row seat on America. We came from different states, ways of life, and religion. We are more a like than we are different. Difference is good, it makes you grow and learn

  • @asmithj … Amendments is a proper mechanism to add, change or remove an amendment. That's the process to do so. However, we should not change it's meaning ever. Nor should judges ignore things they disagree with or circumvent the constition by fiat. It's not a popularity contest. If you disagree with something there is a legal amendment process. Then that change will be constitutional. It's very simple.

  • Do you know when this country was started. A business was not considered a person? The conservative wing of the supreme court just decided for the first time (5 to 4) a business has all the rights of a person. You don't have to agree or disagree. I think that is wrong.

  • @asmithj … Just because a society changes over time does not mean the constitution has to. They are unrelated things. Again, anytime a change in the constitution is needed it can be amended. That is the only proper way to deal with it. Just ignoring it does a disservice since that would make it irrelevent for anything. You can't use a constitution for just the parts you like or agree with. What's the point of having one then?

  • @asmithj …. I think you misundertood the verdict in that decision. As I reag it I take it that they just said that a business with individuals has a right to be treated under the 1st amendment as an individual does by himself. I find it ironic that liberals cry out for terrorists overseas to be given US constitutional rights, but these same people do not feel a business has a right to speak publically. The only bad thing about the verdict is that 4 judges blatently ignored the constitution.

  • Where in the constitution does it refer to a business? Do you believe your country's laws are flexible and only used when the are convenient? Miranda Law is the law of the land. If you step a foot on this land you are subject to it's laws period. If you go to Russia, Hong Kong, South Korea or any other country you are subject to their laws period. We say we are the best and we prove it by standing by our rule of law. Mob rule does not apply if you believe in the law, which I do

  • @asmithj … It doesn't say one way or the other about business. But what the verdict says is that busineses are made up of people. As such they have the same rights under our constitution. Just because these people have a business banner does not limit their rights. This seems very basic and obvious to me.

    Guantanimo took terrorists overseas and brought them to Cuba. They never stepped foot on US soil. Yet, libs say they deserve US rights. Clearly not so according to the constitution.

  • If a business is made up of people and they already have rights, what's the point of the verdit to give them rights they already have? Gitmo is US territory, any US base is US territory.

  • @asmithj …. Exactly.

    The verdict came about because congress passed a law to prevent business from contributing to campaigns and being allowed to do things such as have political commercials for candidates. This was challenged in court and taken to the supreme court. So the court struck down congress's law that essentially limited a businness's right to speak. The court had to make a decision and they did. That's how it works, The constitution trumps any law by congress.

  • @asmithj … GITMO is not us soil. It's not part of the United States. It's in Cuba. I'd say the 14th amendment cleary describes what makes up the united states.

    "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside."

  • I business never ever had the rights you speak of before 2010. That is a change in the interpretation of the constitution, not support.

  • @metallus2 ….. Geez. The truth movement? LOL

    Please! There's no truth in your 9/11 idiocy. You think you are so powerful that Van Jones was forced to resign because of this? LOL

    Van Jones resigned because it was discovered he was a communists and Obama although sympatheic to Mr Jones idealogy didn't want to have people question his own loyalty. The truth Movement? You idiots are a joke!

  • The United States assumed territorial control over Guantánamo Bay under the 1903 Cuban-American Treaty, which granted it a perpetual lease of the area.[1] United States, by virtue of its complete jurisdiction and control, maintains "de facto" sovereignty over this territory.
    Sovereignty – is the quality of having supreme, independent authority over a territory. It can be found in a power to rule and make law that rests on a political fact for which no purely legal explanation can be provided.

  • @asmithj …. Says who? You say they never had the rights before 2010 based on what? The constitution clearly says they did and do have the rights. Sometimes it takes a supreme court decision to clear up a point on contention. There's nothing in the constition that said business did not have such rights. The supreme court was forced to make a ruling because of the law passed by congress which was challened in court. Thats the process in action.

  • @asmithj …. Cuba is not the United States. How much more clearer can that be? Gitmo is a military base. The US has no territorial control over Cuba. What State is Cuba? #51? You are trying to stretch the bounds of the United States to fit your political beliefs when the Constitution clearly does not recognize foreign countries as teh United States. BTW cours have upheld this many times in history for military tribunal purposes. there's nothing new here.

  • Early corporations of the commercial sort were formed under frameworks set up by governments of states to undertake tasks which appeared too risky or too expensive for individuals or governments to embark upon. The alleged oldest commercial corporation in the world, the Stora Kopparberg mining community in Falun, Sweden, reportedly obtained a charter from King Magnus Eriksson in 1347.

  • In the United States, government chartering began to fall out of vogue in the mid-1800s. Corporate law at the time was very restrictive and very closely regulated by the states. Forming a corporation usually required an act of legislature. Investors generally had to be given an equal say in corporate governance, and the corporation's activities were tightly restricted to its express purposes

  • We decided to change a business from a short term thing, to a permanent entity and now a full person. The most important thing is people not profit. Eminent domain, will be determined by corporate interest. Remember Pfizer and Conn home owners. Pfizer won over the home owners. I disagree with that.

  • @asmithj … Well we probably wont agree on may things. So I will leave it at that.

    It's time for my beauty sleep. Goodnight.

  • our prisoners were in GITO, which is in Cuba. Every base we have all over the world has the same rule of law. If we have declared war then we must follow Geneva Convention of war. Either they are military combatants or criminals. If they are military combatants we hold them as prisoners of war. If they are criminals we try them in civilian court

  • We have Blue Cross, we have Medicad so out of 377million people 30million need healthcare, then put these people in the systems that are there already.

  • Funny though how you chose to overlook the words 'MANY' and 'A LOT OF'; as in 'MANY' or 'A LOT OF' truthers are hysterical, tactless clowns. Rather defensive, aren't we?

  • It is not only the 30 million without healthcare. It is all those who DO have healthcare, but aren't actually covered by their insurance even though they have paid (three times as much as Canadians do) for it.

  • He resigned because of the constant attacks from the Far Right. Imagine having an entire cable network and radio networks attacking you, personally, day and night, until you literally fear for your life.

  • Who do you have who would have been better? Hillary? McCain? Who else was there?

    Obama has inherited COLLOSSAL problems from Bush, and Clinton, Bush,Reagan Carter and Ford before him. Bad decisions by all of these men have wrecked the US economy.

  • He was handed a petition that the people said was about helping the victims of 911. That's how you trick people into signing petitions about things that are a bit controversial, be vague about it. I have seen it before, I read a petition somebody wants me to sign, and on page 2 its like communists or scientologists or Pentacostals or something. And signing the wrong online petitions will put you on all kinds of unwanted mailing lists. Gotta be careful.

  • Actually, a lot of the truthers (the Alex Jones crowd) are also birthers. Also teabaggers. I have argued FAR too much with these cretins. They discredit all the honest people who have sincere questions about the legality of what Bush and Cheney have done.

  • Who said anything about an "inside job" do you even read the comments or do you just assumme? I'm guessing the latter, but it's pointlless argueing with a person who thinks they are better then you. Did you know EVERY crime is considered a conspiracy theory into it is proven in the court of law. So by that standard which is true then yes 9-11 is a conspiracy theory, but that doesn't make any less real then the countless crimes that happen on a daily basis.

  • People like you who just jump to conclusions and "punch the man in the nose" are the reason we started two wars. Oh it's okay before I look for evidence I'll just punch or in this case bomb two innocent countries( of course both countries had major problems, but those had nothing to do with 9-11). killing thousands of people, and destroying whole cities. Ignorance such as yours is really a growing problem in America and the world.

  • No, that sounds like Glenn Beck describing the American Government in DC.

    Why can EVERY OTHER WESTERNISED NATION have government controlled healthcare but the US can't manage it?

  • Conservative and Capitalism is not one in the same. Capitalism is ROI Return On Investment, there is no disputing that. You can be a conservative business owner or a liberal business owner, when you make your quarterly conference call to the stock holders. Not once will they ask what your political ideology is. They only want to know if you increased earning period, if not why not and if the answer isn't good enough you have to go. Conservative or Liberal

  • The constitution is pesky any time, you disagree. Do you think the amendments were put in by conservatives or liberals? Does it matter. What matters is you have the right to be a jerk or an angel. I have and will defend your right to both. What you don't have a right to do is put your hands on another to make your point. America is great because of checks and balances, not because of conservative and liberal. Some issues I'm liberal about, some I'm conservative about.

  • good question

    why was the USA first and still the only Country on the moon?

    why does America have such a powerful military, France doesn't

    why did Bill Gates become the richest man, everyone else didn't

    must have something to do with the American philosophy of rugged individualism

    America is losing out, however, progressive cunts want Americans to work for the "collective", just like bees for example

  • True the US is the only one to land a man on the moon. True the US has the largest military. True Bill Gates is the riches man in the world. We must also acknowlege. As the riches country with the month powerful military, we have people dying because they don't have healthcare, we are shipping jobes to china and inda. We also have the largest debt in the world. We need to acknowledge all. Being the best, biggest, or strongest doesn't mean you will win the fight. ie. Tyson v. Douglass

  • I agree with that statement. The same can be said about the patriot act. There is nothing patriotic about it. It wasn't read or understood before the vote. That's how old elected officials are. Old in time not age. We need new ideas and concern for the people. That's the purpose of government. We the People, not we the corporation or we the special interest. What is good for me should be good for you. Access to good healthcare, education, safe neighborhoods, and opportunity to earn

  • We do pay more but introducing UHC is not the answer, here in Italy we have both, and it is just as expencive as the US, THEY are Lying! Here a vy good friend of mine is paying for her cancer treatment, WHY she knows she will get better care and better service, and no waiting.

  • WHO world healthcare ranking.
    2 Italy
    37 United States of America

    Total Expenditure on Health as % of GDP 2005

    Rank
    2 United States 15.2%
    27 Italy 8.9%

    GDP
    # 1 United States: $2,416,510,000,000 YR 2005
    # 7 Italy: $1,762,519,000,000 YR 2005

    Anyway you look at it, we spend more dollars total and a higher percentage of total GDP with lower results. Why?

  • Hmmm… We got rid of the neocons out of the White House and most of the senate, and you crow victory over one person who was easily replaced. What a hollow victory that was, considering how much effort went into it. I mean, you got the Special Advisor for Green Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation at the White House Council on Environmental Quality… And this is going to bring down the whole administration? I mean, it is not even an office anybody has HEARD of.

  • @asmithj It's because of government.the FDA allows toxic chemicals to be used in
    our food,Like artificial flavoring,coloring,preservatives,imitation ingredients and more.Stay away from fast food and pre packaged foods and you will not have health problems.I do not trust the gov. with my health care,food or freedoms.You would be wise to start questioning gov. motives before trusting them with your life.

  • I think if you knew what 'socialist' is, you won't say that. Obama wants good for people, he wanted a health reform because there are people like my aunt who can't afford million dollar surgeries, but pharmaceutical billionaires and republicans won't let that happen &keep saying "people don't want reform"..
    Also, in Canada which is a socialist economy, I can go to the doctor anytime and not get charged a ridiculous amount….you should really find out what socialist means

  • @atrueamerican1 Its because We the People don't Vote. If you want to make a change and believe what you say, vote in every election. National, State and local. We don't vote and we wonder why we get the short end of the stick. Vote, Invest, and service your country.

  • I heard that you guys pay a lot in taxes,so you ARE being charged a ridiculous amount.Health reform is only about taking away your/our right to choose.Personally,I'll take care of my own health without their overpriced drugs that don't fix anything,only mask symptoms.Socialist=loss of personal freedom,period.

  • I don't have health insurance, and don't want it .I have been around more than half a century and if I need a doctor,I pay cash and get a much better deal.They are just trying to guarantee business for the drug companies.

  • I thought he resigned because he said he can be an asshole as opposed to Obama who needs to be presidential.

    I kinda thought Obama asked him to resign because that was not what he wanted for his administration.

    Did I misread the whole situation or are people rewriting what actually happened?

    😛

  • I was just going by my numerous arguments with truthers and birthers right here.

    And I am not the fringe of society. Your rhetoric, like telling me to jump of a cliff, shows that you are far more fringe than me.

  • People have plenty of personal freedom in countries that are far more socialist than the US… And corporations can JUST as easily impinge on personal freedoms as the government can.

  • Missed it again…..

    I never said you were american, nor did I state you supported the wars america is in.

    I simply stated it's people with the state of mind such as yours that put Americans in the middle east. People who just jump the gun and punch people in the face for no justifiable reason at all.

    I also stated that both countires had MAJOR problems which had nothing to do with 9-11.

  • I assume that you are referring to corporations like the drug companies that love to turn citizens into slaves of their dangerous products.Just what do you find attractive about socialism? Is the prospect of the majority suffering so that a few don't have to,appealing to you? When obama is finished, the U.S. will look like Cuba.Sure is a good thing that liberals are only 20% of the population.

  • Cuba? I never said anything about wanting anything like Cuba… What about Japan, or South Korea or Germany or Australia? Why must you leap to an extreme like that?

  • I hope your right, but what if your get cancer, who pays if you can't afford. $30,000 worth of treatment. My father has cancer and thank GOD he has good health insurance. People file bankruptcy every year due to medical bills. So far I believe you have been lucky. I hope your good fortune holds out.

  • Members of the house have suggested that. They called it medicare for all. You could buy into the medicare system. It would have been simple.

  • Did he? You better go look again. This idea is as far from communism or any ism as it gets. But hey, capitalism is doing so well. See how you think in a few years when China calls in its debts. You can be the first to join the troops to fight off the people who you owe money to.

  • China isn't a communist country. It is a totalitarian capitalist country. You see if china does that it would be a result of capitalism controled by the state. Don't tell me I;m wrong go tell Karl Marx who thought of it. Also while communism is great on paper it fails horribly in practice because it would require for peace and total desegregation of all types from race to class to religion.

  • @asmithj YEA AND LOTS OF PEOPLE FILE FOR BANKRUPTCY OVER CREDIT CARDS TO. BUYING HOUSE THEY CANT AFFORD. WHY SHOULD I PAY FOR ANY OF THAT? YOU WANT GOOD INSURANCE BUY IT, GET A GOOD JOB. MAKE GOOD CHOICES.

  • @asmithj I REREAD MY COMMENT, DONT SEE WERE I PUT CC ARE THE NUMBER ONE REASON. IF YOU GO BANKRUPT DUE TO MED BILL, GET BETTER HEALTH CARE, YOU CAN DONT HAVE THE MONEY GET A BETTER JOB. IF YOU DROPPED OUT OF SCHOOL, AND CANT GET A BETTER JOB,HOW IS THAT MY FAULT? FIGURE IT OUT. DONT BE A BLOOD SUCKER.

  • @LIGHTSOUTFOOLS. You can have good healthcare and get sick and then loose that good healthcare. You are blessed if you have never had a long term illness or had a family member with one. I have good healthcare, and I make a good living. I have my degree, but that doesn't prevent me from getting cancer which can have you out of work for months and years. You listed Credit Cards first so I used that as the example if I was wrong I appologize

  • @asmithj SO ALL THE HOMELESS PEOPLE DO NOT HAVE HOMES, SO WHY SHOULD YOU NOT BUY THEM A HOME? THEY DO NOT EAT EVERY DAY 3 TIME A DAY. SO WHY DO NOT YOU SUPPLIE THEM ALL THE FOOD THEY WANT. THAT IS NOT WHAT THIS COUNTRY WAS FOUNDED ON, IT GOES AGAIST EVERYTHING THIS COUNTRY STANDS FOR. THE TRANSFER OR PEOPLES MONEY TO OTHERS, THAT IS SOCOLISM / COMMUNISM SHOW WERE THAT WAY OF LIFE, HAS PRODUCED MORE WEALTH OR MORE OF A MIDDLE CLASS. JUST SHOW ME.

  • @LIGHTSOUTFOOLS Lets use your logic. Here is a list of things you should talk to your local government about. No more Police, Fire Fighting, Public Hospitals, Libraries, Schools, or roads. If you don't pay your monthly fee you don't get access. We the People is how this country was formed. Not me myself and I. What do you think about school reduced and free lunch program? Should we feed the kids or say fend for yourself 5yr – 17yr. No free lunch kids you didn't earn it. get a job.

  • @asmithj YOU MAKE NO SENSE. NO MORE POLICE, FIRE FIGHTING, PUBLIC HOSPITALS (WHICH IM OK WITH) LIBRARIES, SCHOOLS OR ROADS, ON WHAT PLANET DO YOU COMPARE APPLE WITH ORANGES? FREE HEALTHCARE IS THE SAME AS POLICE. WE PAY THEM WITH OUR TAXES. HOWEVER, WE ARE NOT BUYING THE POLICE ARE WE ARE PAYING FOR THEY SERVICE TO US. YOU ARE TELLING ME TO BE A LEGAL CITIZEN I MUST HAVE CAR INSURANCE. IF I DO NOT HAVE A CAR JUST IN CASE I DRIVE SOMEONES CAR AND HURT SOME ONE, OR BE FINED AND/OR PUT IN JAIL

  • @asmithj FOR REFUSING TO BUY CAR INSURANCE? WERE IN THE CONSTITUTION IS THIS PROVISION?
    “Should we feed thekids or say fend for you 5yr – 17yr. No free lunch kids you did not earn it. Get a job.”
    STUPID STATEMENT COULD THERE PARENTS GET A JOB? EVER THOUGHT OF THAT? HOW DID WE MANAGE BEFORE YOU VICTIMS CAME UP WITH ALL THESE GREAT (STUPID) IDEAS?

  • @LIGHTSOUTFOOLS Try to make a point without being rude. Lets use your logic car insurance. The constitution doesn't say anything about car insurance so anyone can drive without it and take their chance right? Wrong they effect everyone they run into. The kids who get free and reduced lunch. To make a statement their parents should just get a job is very simplistic. I am all for you and everyone who believes like you to opt out of insurance. Good luck

  • @asmithj To use logic you need to have logic, you keep comparing apples and oranges. Again, by law do you have to have car insurance? NO! You have to have car insurance if you want to drive, it is a privilege to drive not a right. If you choose not to drive then you do NOT have to buy car insurance. However, to be alive the dictator has just enacted an unconstitutional law that requires all citizens to buy health insurance, if you want it or not. Free lunch .As far as the very simplistic answer

  • @asmithj is a good answer when you have no answer. We do not need good luck we need people who believe in the constitution unlike this Hugo chavezish govt. we have in place now.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *